For his part, Hinton echoed his remarks from earlier in the day that he was “flabbergasted” to receive the prize and pleased that the Nobel committee recognized the advancements in artificial neural networks.
He also answered questions about his influences, legacy and how it feels to go from being an obscure researcher who toiled in a largely forsaken field to a Nobel Laureate — and his advice for researchers who hope to one day follow in his footsteps.
Here are five key themes that emerged from Hinton's news conference:
His legacy
“I’m hoping AI will lead to tremendous benefits, to tremendous increases in productivity and to a better life for everybody. I’m convinced that it will do that in health care.
“My worry is that it may also lead to bad things, and in particular, when we get things more intelligent than ourselves, no one really knows whether we’re going to be able to control them.
“We don’t know how to avoid [catastrophic AI scenarios] at present. That’s why we urgently need more research. So I’m advocating that our best young researchers, or many of them, should work on AI safety and governments should force large companies to provide the computational facilities they need to do that.”
A collaborative effort
“I think of the prize as a recognition of a large community of people who worked on artificial neural networks for many years.
“I’d particularly like to acknowledge my two main mentors: David Rumelhart, with whom I worked on the backpropagation algorithm … and my colleague Terry Sejnowsky, who I worked with a lot in the 1980s on Boltzmann machines and who taught me a lot about the brain.
“I’d also like to acknowledge my students. I was particularly fortunate to have many clever students, much cleverer than me, who actually made things work. They’ve gone on to do great things.
“I should also acknowledge Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun who were close colleagues and very instrumental in developing this whole field.”
Canada’s research strengths
“I think the main thing about Canada as a place to do research is there isn’t as much money as there is in the U.S., but it uses its money quite wisely.
“In particular, the main funding council for this type of research, called NSERC, uses money for basic curiosity-driven research, and all of these advances in neural networks came out of basic curiosity-driven research — not out of throwing money at applied problems, but out of letting scientists follow their curiosity to try and understand things. And Canada’s quite good at that.”
Many thought he was wasting his time
“It was a lot of fun doing the research, but it was slightly annoying that many people — in fact, most people in the field of AI — said that neural networks would never work.
"They were very confident these things were a waste of time and we would never be able to learn complicated things — for example, understanding natural language — using neural networks. And they were wrong."
Believe in your ideas
"My message is this: if you believe in something, don’t give up on it until you understand why that belief is wrong.
"Often, you believe in things and you eventually figure out why that’s a wrong thing to believe in. But so long as you believe in something and you can’t see why that’s wrong — like, ‘the brain has to work somehow so we have to figure out how it learns the connection strengths to make it work’ — keep working on it and don’t let people tell you it’s nonsense if you can’t see why it’s nonsense."